Speeding bikers beat the cameras

4 posts / 0 new
Last post
chmeee5's picture
Joined: Apr 9 2009
Speeding bikers beat the cameras
A NATIONAL police commissioners' plan to force motorcyclists to wear front number plates has been dumped after 10 years' study, at a direct cost of almost $500,000 and millions more lost in government revenues.
For almost 30 years, motorcyclists have been able to thumb their noses at speed cameras - sometimes travelling at more than double the speed limit - because they have not had to display front number plates for safety reasons.

States are forgoing an estimated $2million a year each in revenue from fines as motorcycles evade detection on speed cameras.

The latest report from Victoria's Road Safety and Transport group said this month that "identifying vehicles engaged in illegal acts, such as speeding or travelling through red lights at intersections, is a significant issue for enforcement agencies".

Some motorcyclists also escape detection from cameras that shoot the offenders by covering their rear licence plates.

Others flaunt their immunity by doing wheelies past police cameras.

Some offenders are caught only when they are identified by the tattoos on their arms.
Last year, NSW police arrested a motorcyclist who allegedly sped past police cameras near the Spit Bridge in Sydney more than 2000 times while covering his rear number plate with his hand to avoid detection. The motorcyclist was finally arrested and charged with 62 offences after a policeman recognised his clothing and motorbike and saw him speed past a camera with a hand over his rear plate. The motorcyclist lost 200 demerit points and was fined $7500.

Last night, West Australian Police Minister Rob Johnson told The Australian: "I don't believe anyone, motorcyclists, car or truck drivers, should be able to speed past a camera with impunity and continually put their own and other people's lives at risk."

In 2000, all police commissioners asked for a study to put front licence plates back on motorcycles because police believed riders were speeding because they would not be caught.

Front plates were removed after injuries to riders and pedestrians and because the plates affected air flow and steering.

According to Freedom of Information documents obtained by the Pedestrian Council of Australia, the study, conducted by Victorian transport authorities, found it was possible to use a system of stick-on plates or a mounting. However a method suitable for every existing motorcycle could not be found.

The study, ordered by the Australian Transport Council, which includes all transport ministers, went from 2002 to 2007 and cost taxpayers $419,980.

In March this year the Standing Committee on Transport decided not to proceed with the idea of front number plates and handed responsibility to the Queensland government to investigate electronic methods of identifying motorcycles from the roadside.

Last night a spokesman for federal Transport Minister Anthony Albanese said the Australian Transport Council had not considered the issue while he was minister.

The director of the Pedestrian Council of Australia, Harold Scruby, said that "one motorcyclist can break the law more than 2000 times is proof positive the system is a farce".

Mr Johnson said Western Australia was now leading the way with technology to get around the lack of number plates on motorcycles, with trials of dual lens cameras that photograph vehicles from both the front and rear.



Source from http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,26074126-2702,00.html


kate's picture
Joined: May 23 2006
$500,000 dollars later they

$500,000 dollars later they come to the conclusion that the only thing which essentially will work is cameras that shoot both ways , and that is exactly what they were told by most motorcycle groups at the very beginning of this particular episode of the continual vendetta against motorbike riders. Safety? Oh no , this article says it up front - " States are forgoing an estimated $2million a year each in revenue from fines as motorcycles evade detection on speed cameras." .

M.I.A's picture
Joined: Dec 6 2008
Good read C5 and for once

Good read C5 and for once its turned out our way,,, hehe

It just shows how meny people must sit on the gravy trians of these state & Fed goverments and commities set up to look into these things,,, there are thousands of issue like this that get no where but cost $$$$$$$$$ of tax payers $$$$$$$

chmeee5's picture
Joined: Apr 9 2009
It is perhaps ironic that a

It is perhaps ironic that a commerial entity such as Breeze (Eastlink) has been able to work out the two-way camera thing and our loverly goverments insist on spending 1/3 of the anticipated revenue to decide the same.

User login

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.